141
editsAd placeholder
Talk:Astarion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→MTG Cards advertising and canonicity?: Reply
AFrigidDoor (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::::So, I'm not familiar with how discussion topics are resolved on wikis- do we have to wait until we have a consensus or should I edit the current info to be neater, moving the cards to the gallery and making the ad a reference instead? (This is taking into account that the validity of his former background is still being discussed so we haven't reached a consensus regarding whether it is canon or not) [[User:AFrigidDoor|AFrigidDoor]] ([[User talk:AFrigidDoor|talk]]) 14:06, 15 January 2025 (CET) | :::::So, I'm not familiar with how discussion topics are resolved on wikis- do we have to wait until we have a consensus or should I edit the current info to be neater, moving the cards to the gallery and making the ad a reference instead? (This is taking into account that the validity of his former background is still being discussed so we haven't reached a consensus regarding whether it is canon or not) [[User:AFrigidDoor|AFrigidDoor]] ([[User talk:AFrigidDoor|talk]]) 14:06, 15 January 2025 (CET) | ||
::::::You could edit the current info to be neater, make the ad a reference and also move the cards and the ad. And Astarion's background as noble should be considered possible but not definitely proven. The use of the word "background" for this topic should be avoided, because it could be misleading. It's already used for a specific game mechanic; Astarion has the (game mechanic) background "Charlatan". So maybe we should use something like "social status"? [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 17:15, 15 January 2025 (CET) | ::::::You could edit the current info to be neater, make the ad a reference and also move the cards and the ad. And Astarion's background as noble should be considered possible but not definitely proven. The use of the word "background" for this topic should be avoided, because it could be misleading. It's already used for a specific game mechanic; Astarion has the (game mechanic) background "Charlatan". So maybe we should use something like "social status"? [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 17:15, 15 January 2025 (CET) | ||
:::::::On it. I'll also move the noble mention to a more appropriate spot. Anyone else, feel free to touch up my revision or further discuss this topic, as always. [[User:AFrigidDoor|AFrigidDoor]] ([[User talk:AFrigidDoor|talk]]) 17:51, 15 January 2025 (CET) |