23,706
editsAd placeholder
Talk:Astarion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→MTG Cards advertising and canonicity?
AFrigidDoor (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::I agree that it could be speculated that Astarion a noble, but the evidence, we have is not enough. Because being a Magistrate does not neccessarily mean being a noble. And that he had the noble background in EA is not that relevant because Larian changed it, so it is no longer canon as it was mentioned before. And Neil Newbon seems, in this case, as it was said before, not a valid source for this particular information. | ::::I agree that it could be speculated that Astarion a noble, but the evidence, we have is not enough. Because being a Magistrate does not neccessarily mean being a noble. And that he had the noble background in EA is not that relevant because Larian changed it, so it is no longer canon as it was mentioned before. And Neil Newbon seems, in this case, as it was said before, not a valid source for this particular information. | ||
::::So I would move the whole thing in the Notes section. | ::::So I would move the whole thing in the Notes section. | ||
::::And imho the cards should be moved below the gallery section, at best as part (or | ::::And imho the cards should be moved below the gallery section, at best as part (or sub-section) of the gallery. [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 14:18, 9 January 2025 (CET) | ||
:::::So, I'm not familiar with how discussion topics are resolved on wikis- do we have to wait until we have a consensus or should I edit the current info to be neater, moving the cards to the gallery and making the ad a reference instead? (This is taking into account that the validity of his former background is still being discussed so we haven't reached a consensus regarding whether it is canon or not) [[User:AFrigidDoor|AFrigidDoor]] ([[User talk:AFrigidDoor|talk]]) 14:06, 15 January 2025 (CET) | :::::So, I'm not familiar with how discussion topics are resolved on wikis- do we have to wait until we have a consensus or should I edit the current info to be neater, moving the cards to the gallery and making the ad a reference instead? (This is taking into account that the validity of his former background is still being discussed so we haven't reached a consensus regarding whether it is canon or not) [[User:AFrigidDoor|AFrigidDoor]] ([[User talk:AFrigidDoor|talk]]) 14:06, 15 January 2025 (CET) |