Ad placeholder
bg3wiki talk:Ads Announcement 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Why not set up a Patreon or make Kofi more accessible?: Reply
(→Let the enshittification begin: Reply) |
|||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
:::::If it does go south like I fear, that will likely happen. I hope it doesn't, but I'm not able to trust your word right now. We'll see. | :::::If it does go south like I fear, that will likely happen. I hope it doesn't, but I'm not able to trust your word right now. We'll see. | ||
:::::For the sake of the community, I won't raise too much of a stink about it, but I'll remain an advocate against ads - because I felt like that was a LARGE chunk of the reason as to why this particular wiki exists in the first place. [[User:Schism|Schism]] ([[User talk:Schism|talk]]) 00:17, 30 July 2024 (CEST) | :::::For the sake of the community, I won't raise too much of a stink about it, but I'll remain an advocate against ads - because I felt like that was a LARGE chunk of the reason as to why this particular wiki exists in the first place. [[User:Schism|Schism]] ([[User talk:Schism|talk]]) 00:17, 30 July 2024 (CEST) | ||
::::I agree. They are claiming that there has been a majority of positive support for this huge move to monetization but I just do not see this claim at all. Both here and Reddit has been very controversial and mixed. Maybe I am not seeing elsewhere and would like to be wrong. I support the idea of someone making money off of their work but in this case it is way too messy and far too soon due to BG3's popularity and continued high level of players. | |||
::::I used to edit wikis all the time when I was younger and to think I'd have been caught up in this web of uncertain promises (and sadly, already broken ones) would not be OK with me. | |||
::::There's nothing to be done as they made up their mind but the way it's been handled has been really off. [[Special:Contributions/163.53.145.5|163.53.145.5]] 14:46, 30 July 2024 (CEST) | |||