Ad placeholder

User talk:Nattern: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
380 bytes removed ,  25 February 2024
m
no edit summary
(→‎Tenacity: new section)
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


I am also very active on discord, so feel free to send me a [https://discord.com/users/513458662237274123 DM] or ping me in the [https://discord.com/invite/K6R89fSZuF bg3.wiki Discord].
I am also very active on discord, so feel free to send me a [https://discord.com/users/513458662237274123 DM] or ping me in the [https://discord.com/invite/K6R89fSZuF bg3.wiki Discord].
== Tenacity ==
I disagree. [[Tenacity]] is referred to as a Weapon Action, and also states that it requires proficiency in its respective weapon.  Is the wiki wrong?  Regardless, being a Weapon Action it should not be placed in the Special category which is usually for placement of spells/actions unique to the specific weapon (e.g. not found on all weapons of the same type).


== Tenacity ==
== Tenacity ==


I disagree. [[Tenacity]] is referred to as a Weapon Action, and also states that it requires proficiency in its respective weapon.  Is the wiki wrong?  Regardless, being a Weapon Action it should not be placed in the Special category which is usually for placement of spells/actions unique to the specific weapon (e.g. not found on all weapons of the same type).[[User:Rydiak|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak|talk]])
I disagree. [[Tenacity]] is referred to as a Weapon Action, and also states that it requires proficiency in its respective weapon.  Is the wiki wrong?  Regardless, being a Weapon Action it should not be placed in the Special category which is usually for placement of spells/actions unique to the specific weapon (e.g. not found on all weapons of the same type).[[User:Rydiak|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak|talk]])

Navigation menu