User talk:84.122.126.28: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 5 January by 84.122.126.28 in topic Good job
(→Good job: Reply) |
(→Good job: Reply) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I saw the latest personality edit- I won't edit it back but I wanted to note that I feel like AA does pretty clearly strive for world domination even if he never outright says "I want to conquer the world" (he wants to create a city of spawn and cast a fog over the world for his children, tells Tav that they could have "everything", that "the world is ours for the taking", and similarly wants to subdue the netherbrain to be Absolute for reasons that strike me as very world-conquery. When he's told by Durge that they will spare him when they conquer the world, he says "Not if I get there first", etc etc). However I concede that in the epilogue it's implied he's contained to conquering a city, for now (he also says there's an entire world out there ready for the taking, Tav can recognise that Astarion is aiming to conquer the world which he will acknowledge with appreciation, and when Mindflayer Tav says they're thinking about taking over the world Astarion refers to it as a mutual interest.) | :::I saw the latest personality edit- I won't edit it back but I wanted to note that I feel like AA does pretty clearly strive for world domination even if he never outright says "I want to conquer the world" (he wants to create a city of spawn and cast a fog over the world for his children, tells Tav that they could have "everything", that "the world is ours for the taking", and similarly wants to subdue the netherbrain to be Absolute for reasons that strike me as very world-conquery. When he's told by Durge that they will spare him when they conquer the world, he says "Not if I get there first", etc etc). However I concede that in the epilogue it's implied he's contained to conquering a city, for now (he also says there's an entire world out there ready for the taking, Tav can recognise that Astarion is aiming to conquer the world which he will acknowledge with appreciation, and when Mindflayer Tav says they're thinking about taking over the world Astarion refers to it as a mutual interest.) | ||
:::That being said, I'd also advice to avoid language that might seem inflammatory to folks who like AA. I'm not part of them but certain language I think is bound to create more editing wars. [[Special:Contributions/84.122.126.28|84.122.126.28]] 19:42, 5 January 2025 (CET) | :::That being said, I'd also advice to avoid language that might seem inflammatory to folks who like AA. I'm not part of them but certain language I think is bound to create more editing wars. [[Special:Contributions/84.122.126.28|84.122.126.28]] 19:42, 5 January 2025 (CET) | ||
::::Just checked, and the OG NR poster only did another edit, seen here: https://bg3.wiki/w/index.php?title=Vellioth&diff=prev&oldid=257157 | |||
::::The edit is again extremely subjective, making assumptions instead of stating ingame facts that already let the reader conclude certain things, which I'm not a fan of. I'll remove it. [[Special:Contributions/84.122.126.28|84.122.126.28]] 19:47, 5 January 2025 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 19:47, 5 January 2025
Good job
Your edit on the timeline with Astarion was well done and well explained, thank you. Raelin (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2025 (CET)
- Thanks, that's very kind :) 84.122.126.28 19:13, 5 January 2025 (CET)
- There are several other timeline edits, probaby done by the same contributor, that may contain similar unproven and/or erroneous assertions. If I may humbly ask, could you look at those too and adjust them as you see needed? A search for "NR" on the wiki may pull most, if not all, of them up... Raelin (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2025 (CET)
- I can take a look, although my area of expertise is Astarion. That being said, I can't recall NR being used throughout the game, so any other related edits might be fandom presumptions as well.
- I saw the latest personality edit- I won't edit it back but I wanted to note that I feel like AA does pretty clearly strive for world domination even if he never outright says "I want to conquer the world" (he wants to create a city of spawn and cast a fog over the world for his children, tells Tav that they could have "everything", that "the world is ours for the taking", and similarly wants to subdue the netherbrain to be Absolute for reasons that strike me as very world-conquery. When he's told by Durge that they will spare him when they conquer the world, he says "Not if I get there first", etc etc). However I concede that in the epilogue it's implied he's contained to conquering a city, for now (he also says there's an entire world out there ready for the taking, Tav can recognise that Astarion is aiming to conquer the world which he will acknowledge with appreciation, and when Mindflayer Tav says they're thinking about taking over the world Astarion refers to it as a mutual interest.)
- That being said, I'd also advice to avoid language that might seem inflammatory to folks who like AA. I'm not part of them but certain language I think is bound to create more editing wars. 84.122.126.28 19:42, 5 January 2025 (CET)
- Just checked, and the OG NR poster only did another edit, seen here: https://bg3.wiki/w/index.php?title=Vellioth&diff=prev&oldid=257157
- The edit is again extremely subjective, making assumptions instead of stating ingame facts that already let the reader conclude certain things, which I'm not a fan of. I'll remove it. 84.122.126.28 19:47, 5 January 2025 (CET)
- There are several other timeline edits, probaby done by the same contributor, that may contain similar unproven and/or erroneous assertions. If I may humbly ask, could you look at those too and adjust them as you see needed? A search for "NR" on the wiki may pull most, if not all, of them up... Raelin (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2025 (CET)