More actions
→Mathematics: 2d4 has a 6.25% chance of rolling 8, not 6.125%
HarveyPekar (talk | contribs) m (removing the sentence that's broken in excerpts + link to full page) |
(→Mathematics: 2d4 has a 6.25% chance of rolling 8, not 6.125%) |
||
| Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Notice how often the 5 appears in the possibilities for the '''total value''' (4 out of 16 possibilities) vs. how often the 8 appears (1 out of 16). This means a 2d4 roll has a 25% chance of resulting in 5 points of damage, but only a 6. | Notice how often the 5 appears in the possibilities for the '''total value''' (4 out of 16 possibilities) vs. how often the 8 appears (1 out of 16). This means a 2d4 roll has a 25% chance of resulting in 5 points of damage, but only a 6.25% chance of resulting in 8 points of damage. Meanwhile, the 1d8 roll actually has a higher chance of resulting in the maximum damage value of 8, since 1 out of 8 possibilities (12.5%) result in an 8. However, the average roll of 2d4 is 5 damage, while the average roll of 1d8 is only 4.5. Therefore, 2d4 is generally more consistent in damage output and will result in higher rolls in the long run. | ||
=== Advantage mathematics === | === Advantage mathematics === | ||