Talk:Advantage: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
Line 8: Line 8:


'''Advantage is negated by Disadvantage. The number of Advantages and Disadvantages you have is irrelevant. Even if you have three sources of Advantage, a single source of Disadvantage will negate it.'''
'''Advantage is negated by Disadvantage. The number of Advantages and Disadvantages you have is irrelevant. Even if you have three sources of Advantage, a single source of Disadvantage will negate it.'''
both statements are correct, if you have advantage and disadvantage, neither will have any effect on rolls regardless of how many "stacks" of advantage you have.

Latest revision as of 20:02, 13 October 2023

How does Disadvantage and Advantage works together?[edit source]

We have two times the text, just flipped.

Disadvantage is negated by Advantage. The number of Advantages and Disadvantages you have is irrelevant. Even if you have three sources of Disadvantage, a single source of Advantage will negate it.

This needs confirmation, because it is the same text like in Advantage:

Advantage is negated by Disadvantage. The number of Advantages and Disadvantages you have is irrelevant. Even if you have three sources of Advantage, a single source of Disadvantage will negate it.


both statements are correct, if you have advantage and disadvantage, neither will have any effect on rolls regardless of how many "stacks" of advantage you have.