User talk:LostAccount2099: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: 29 January by Rydiak in topic Monster Slayer Glaive
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply Source
Tags: Reply Source
 
Line 4: Line 4:


:Ok i see it now. When the behaviour is just unexpected (say Knife of Undermountain King providing crit range to other weapons), we use Notes. When it's wrong considering what was described (like Monster slayer, Shriek or Baneful Striking) we use Bugs. Is that correct? [[User:LostAccount2099|LostAccount2099]] ([[User talk:LostAccount2099|talk]]) 20:39, 29 January 2025 (CET)
:Ok i see it now. When the behaviour is just unexpected (say Knife of Undermountain King providing crit range to other weapons), we use Notes. When it's wrong considering what was described (like Monster slayer, Shriek or Baneful Striking) we use Bugs. Is that correct? [[User:LostAccount2099|LostAccount2099]] ([[User talk:LostAccount2099|talk]]) 20:39, 29 January 2025 (CET)
::Pretty much! [[User:Rydiak|Rydiak]] ([[User talk:Rydiak|talk]]) 20:42, 29 January 2025 (CET)

Latest revision as of 20:42, 29 January 2025

Monster Slayer Glaive[edit source]

Hey LostAccount2099, I have to ask that you please do not change the bugs field to a notes field on Monster Slayer Glaive. The passive states that the effect occurs for "this weapon", but it in actuality affects all attacks when worn in combat. It is tagged as a bug for tracking purposes for Larian since it does not do what it is supposed to. Thanks! Rydiak (talk) 12:17, 28 January 2025 (CET)Reply[reply]

Ok i see it now. When the behaviour is just unexpected (say Knife of Undermountain King providing crit range to other weapons), we use Notes. When it's wrong considering what was described (like Monster slayer, Shriek or Baneful Striking) we use Bugs. Is that correct? LostAccount2099 (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2025 (CET)Reply[reply]
Pretty much! Rydiak (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2025 (CET)Reply[reply]