Talk:Resistances: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: Monday at 21:35 by Pjotr of the East in topic Is all non-physical damage magical?
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(LF list of ways to apply vulnerable)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: New topic Visual
Line 10: Line 10:


[[User:Elskells55|Elskells55]] ([[User talk:Elskells55|talk]]) 00:41, 9 April 2024 (CEST)
[[User:Elskells55|Elskells55]] ([[User talk:Elskells55|talk]]) 00:41, 9 April 2024 (CEST)
== Is all non-physical damage magical? ==
It seems that all non-physical (by physical I mean bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing) damage is magical. For example, even arrows of fire or achemist's fire potions are considered magical fire damage. If that is the case, then it should mentioned in the article. This would clarify, for example, how [[Heavy Armour Master]] feat works.
[[User:Pjotr of the East|Pjotr of the East]] ([[User talk:Pjotr of the East|talk]]) 21:35, 13 January 2025 (CET)

Revision as of 21:35, 13 January 2025

Resistances stacking?

Does any resistance type stacks? Like Tiefling fire resistance + Barbarian rage (bear) + Warding Bond (spell)?


List of ways to apply vulnerability

I’ve been seeing a lot of people talk about some items that can apply different vulnerabilities to targets. Would be nice to get a list.

Elskells55 (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2024 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Is all non-physical damage magical?

It seems that all non-physical (by physical I mean bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing) damage is magical. For example, even arrows of fire or achemist's fire potions are considered magical fire damage. If that is the case, then it should mentioned in the article. This would clarify, for example, how Heavy Armour Master feat works.

Pjotr of the East (talk) 21:35, 13 January 2025 (CET)Reply[reply]