Talk:Diving Strike: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 27 August by Asheresh in topic Bugs Section Incomplete and/or Inaccurate
(→Bugs Section Either Incomplete or Inaccurate: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Bugs Section | == Bugs Section Incomplete and/or Inaccurate == | ||
You can literally roll a natural 20 (crit) on your Diving Strike, decline to use Reckless Attack, and still get no attack, no roll, no nothing in the combat log. My suspicion is that sometimes it just straight-up doesn't work at all and that any attempts to implicate Reckless Attack are inaccurate guesswork. It certainly is not true that it only bugs when/if you use Reckless Attack. I haven't been able to reliably reproduce the conditions that cause the bug. [[User:Asheresh|Asheresh]] ([[User talk:Asheresh|talk]]) 00:21, 28 August 2024 (CEST) | You can literally roll a natural 20 (crit) on your Diving Strike, decline to use Reckless Attack, and still get no attack, no roll, no nothing in the combat log. My suspicion is that sometimes it just straight-up doesn't work at all and that any attempts to implicate Reckless Attack are inaccurate guesswork. It certainly is not true that it only bugs when/if you use Reckless Attack. I haven't been able to reliably reproduce the conditions that cause the bug. [[User:Asheresh|Asheresh]] ([[User talk:Asheresh|talk]]) 00:21, 28 August 2024 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:21, 27 August 2024
Bugs Section Incomplete and/or Inaccurate[edit source]
You can literally roll a natural 20 (crit) on your Diving Strike, decline to use Reckless Attack, and still get no attack, no roll, no nothing in the combat log. My suspicion is that sometimes it just straight-up doesn't work at all and that any attempts to implicate Reckless Attack are inaccurate guesswork. It certainly is not true that it only bugs when/if you use Reckless Attack. I haven't been able to reliably reproduce the conditions that cause the bug. Asheresh (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2024 (CEST)