Talk:Feats: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: 21 December 2023 by Willowisp in topic Table delete
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
Why is someone going around deleting tables on the pages.  They're easier to read than lists. {{unsigned73.67.183.10|10:03, 21 December 2023}}
Why is someone going around deleting tables on the pages.  They're easier to read than lists. {{unsigned73.67.183.10|10:03, 21 December 2023}}
: Hi! Tables [[Help: Style manual#Links and tables|should be avoided when there are more accessible alternatives]], because while they look good on some devices they are an accessibility concern. The table on this page specifically wasn't implemented in a very accessible way, so until someone remakes the table correctly, this is the more accessible alternative. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (CET)
: Hi! Tables [[Help: Style manual#Links and tables|should be avoided when there are more accessible alternatives]], because while they look good on some devices they are an accessibility concern. The table on this page specifically wasn't implemented in a very accessible way, so until someone remakes the table correctly, this is the more accessible alternative. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (CET)
:: Working on a new and updated format so we can add the table back. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (CET)

Revision as of 14:02, 21 December 2023

Spell sniper bugged?

I've heard that rolling a 19 with spell sniper isn't resulting in the critical hit. Could be an important note as this would mean the feat is totally broken right now.

This was fixed as of Patch 3 👍AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Tips section?

The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a community guide and link it on the article (see Template:Guidenote) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. Willowisp (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Polearm Master

Hey, Tested this feat at Patch #5, it also seems to work with Pike and Trident, even though not mentioned.

Table delete

Why is someone going around deleting tables on the pages. They're easier to read than lists. Template:Unsigned73.67.183.10

Hi! Tables should be avoided when there are more accessible alternatives, because while they look good on some devices they are an accessibility concern. The table on this page specifically wasn't implemented in a very accessible way, so until someone remakes the table correctly, this is the more accessible alternative. Willowisp (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]
Working on a new and updated format so we can add the table back. Willowisp (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]