Talk:Feats: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: 27 October 2023 by Willowisp in topic Tips section?
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(comment + suggestion)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
==Tips section?==
==Tips section?==
The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? [[User:AstraTheDragon|AstraTheDragon]] ([[User talk:AstraTheDragon|talk]]) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? [[User:AstraTheDragon|AstraTheDragon]] ([[User talk:AstraTheDragon|talk]]) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
: I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a [[Help:Guide namespace|community guide]] and link it on the article (see [[Template:Guidenote]]) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:07, 27 October 2023

Spell sniper bugged?

I've heard that rolling a 19 with spell sniper isn't resulting in the critical hit. Could be an important note as this would mean the feat is totally broken right now.

This was fixed as of Patch 3 👍AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Tips section?

The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a community guide and link it on the article (see Template:Guidenote) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. Willowisp (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]