Talk:Tiefling: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 27 October by 70.173.57.16 in topic Zariel Tiefling Spell DC (I think it should be CHA)
No edit summary |
(→Zariel Tiefling Spell DC (I think it should be CHA): new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Zariel Tieflings' Branding Smite hits 100% of the time when the melee version is used and 0% of the time when the ranged version is used. | Zariel Tieflings' Branding Smite hits 100% of the time when the melee version is used and 0% of the time when the ranged version is used. | ||
{{unsigned|Gavinfitz81|18:18, 26 October 2023}} | {{unsigned|Gavinfitz81|18:18, 26 October 2023}} | ||
== Zariel Tiefling Spell DC (I think it should be CHA) == | |||
I tested my 3rd lvl zariel tiefling and cast searing smite twice in a fight. One was the racial, one was the memorized spell. They both had a DC 13 when the enemy saved when I looked at the combat log. My CHA is 16(+3) my CON is 15(+2). It seems they both used my CHA for DC, I think the wiki is wrong. [[Special:Contributions/70.173.57.16|70.173.57.16]] 05:05, 27 October 2024 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:05, 27 October 2024
Asmodeus Tieflings' racial spell Produce Flame uses Wisdom as its spellcasting ability. Pretty sure it's supposed to be Charisma and is therefore a bug.
Zariel Tieflings' Branding Smite hits 100% of the time when the melee version is used and 0% of the time when the ranged version is used. — unsigned comment by Gavinfitz81 (talk) 18:18, 26 October 2023
Zariel Tiefling Spell DC (I think it should be CHA)[edit source]
I tested my 3rd lvl zariel tiefling and cast searing smite twice in a fight. One was the racial, one was the memorized spell. They both had a DC 13 when the enemy saved when I looked at the combat log. My CHA is 16(+3) my CON is 15(+2). It seems they both used my CHA for DC, I think the wiki is wrong. 70.173.57.16 05:05, 27 October 2024 (CET)