Talk:Enriched Infernal Iron: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 2 June by NtCarlson in topic Mod advertisement
(→Mod advertisement: Reply) |
(→Mod advertisement: Reply) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I second this. Mods don't belong here but on a dedicated page to modding. [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 11:34, 2 June 2024 (CEST) | :I second this. Mods don't belong here but on a dedicated page to modding. [[User:Hawkeye|Hawkeye]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye|talk]]) 11:34, 2 June 2024 (CEST) | ||
:I agree. I also would be fine with linking bug fix mods on pages that discuss bugs. The mod in question, though, is tangentially related at best and definitely out of place. [[User:NtCarlson|NtCarlson]] ([[User talk:NtCarlson|talk]]) 15:21, 2 June 2024 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 14:21, 2 June 2024
Mod advertisement
Regarding the external links sub-section of the page, which contains information about what a 3rd party mod does with this item, I don't think individual pages on the BG3 wiki are the right place for mods to be advertised. If it was a bug fix, then I wouldn't mind, but this is not one.
Other gaming wikis, which had similar issues, usually create a dedicated page to modding -- where people can add whatever they want there instead of letting it spill over the entire wiki.
Subsequently, I'm voting and calling for the removal of the 'External Links' sub-section of this page. Viktoria Landers (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2024 (CEST)
- I second this. Mods don't belong here but on a dedicated page to modding. Hawkeye (talk) 11:34, 2 June 2024 (CEST)
- I agree. I also would be fine with linking bug fix mods on pages that discuss bugs. The mod in question, though, is tangentially related at best and definitely out of place. NtCarlson (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2024 (CEST)