Talk:Incense: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: 16 August 2023 by Llamageddon
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. [[User:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|Cactus_Cuddle_Party]] ([[User talk:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|talk]]) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST)
If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. [[User:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|Cactus_Cuddle_Party]] ([[User talk:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|talk]]) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST)
: I agree, absolutely. In this case, they are substantially different, as far as the wiki is concerned. The same item is listed as having little to no value on one section of the [[Miscellaneous]] page, and also as a 'Valuable' on the same page. Both are correct, depending on the incense variant. If this was changed, changing the item would be preferable to changing the page or sections. Not a big issue, but in principle, avoiding contradictory or misleading information can't hurt. I'm sure there are much higher priorities for clarification though, I just wanted to make a note of this on the talk page, in case it comes up, or another editor was wondering about the discrepancy. [[User:Llamageddon|Llamageddon]] ([[User talk:Llamageddon|talk]]) 04:57, 16 August 2023 (CEST)
: Just to add, I was told on the discord, that adding multiple templates to one page should be avoided if possible, or I would have already followed your suggestion. Nitpicking maybe, but items in different categories on the wiki, seem like they should have separate pages, ideally. [[User:Llamageddon|Llamageddon]] ([[User talk:Llamageddon|talk]]) 04:57, 16 August 2023 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 03:57, 16 August 2023

Low priority, but; there are at least 5 different visual variations of items called incense, some of which are valuable. Differentiating every one is most likely a very low priority, but adding a price range, or adding a 'junk' disambiguation page, might avoid confusion for people using the wiki to look up valuable loot. Llamageddon (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. Cactus_Cuddle_Party (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST)

I agree, absolutely. In this case, they are substantially different, as far as the wiki is concerned. The same item is listed as having little to no value on one section of the Miscellaneous page, and also as a 'Valuable' on the same page. Both are correct, depending on the incense variant. If this was changed, changing the item would be preferable to changing the page or sections. Not a big issue, but in principle, avoiding contradictory or misleading information can't hurt. I'm sure there are much higher priorities for clarification though, I just wanted to make a note of this on the talk page, in case it comes up, or another editor was wondering about the discrepancy. Llamageddon (talk) 04:57, 16 August 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]
Just to add, I was told on the discord, that adding multiple templates to one page should be avoided if possible, or I would have already followed your suggestion. Nitpicking maybe, but items in different categories on the wiki, seem like they should have separate pages, ideally. Llamageddon (talk) 04:57, 16 August 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]