Template talk:Infobox statistics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Infobox gives incorrect values: new section) |
(→Infobox gives incorrect values: Reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There's currently an error with the infobox. If you enter a creature's level it automatically displays its proficiency bonus, but these values are sometimes not correct. For a level 5 it gives a bonus of +2, but it should be +3. For level 6 it correctly gives +3. For level 9 it gives +3 while it should be +4. For level 10 it correctly gives +4. I assume that the other levels are correct too. [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 23:05, 8 March 2024 (CET) | There's currently an error with the infobox. If you enter a creature's level it automatically displays its proficiency bonus, but these values are sometimes not correct. For a level 5 it gives a bonus of +2, but it should be +3. For level 6 it correctly gives +3. For level 9 it gives +3 while it should be +4. For level 10 it correctly gives +4. I assume that the other levels are correct too. [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 23:05, 8 March 2024 (CET) | ||
:Can you check now? The calculation appeared to be off by 1 because it was using > instead of >= [[User:HiddenDragon|HiddenDragon]] ([[User talk:HiddenDragon|talk]]) 23:35, 8 March 2024 (CET) | |||
::Yes, now it's correct. Thanks for fixing it. [[User:Sparkle|Sparkle]] ([[User talk:Sparkle|talk]]) 23:55, 8 March 2024 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:55, 8 March 2024
Infobox gives incorrect values[edit source]
There's currently an error with the infobox. If you enter a creature's level it automatically displays its proficiency bonus, but these values are sometimes not correct. For a level 5 it gives a bonus of +2, but it should be +3. For level 6 it correctly gives +3. For level 9 it gives +3 while it should be +4. For level 10 it correctly gives +4. I assume that the other levels are correct too. Sparkle (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2024 (CET)
- Can you check now? The calculation appeared to be off by 1 because it was using > instead of >= HiddenDragon (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2024 (CET)