Talk:Firebolt?: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 26 March by 24.161.29.45 in topic No attack
(→No attack: new section) |
(→No attack: Reply) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The page lists the spell as having an attack roll, and mentions the spell is exactly the same as firebolt except for the chance of casting fireball. This isn't true, the spell has no attack roll and the firebolt automatically hits its targets. | The page lists the spell as having an attack roll, and mentions the spell is exactly the same as firebolt except for the chance of casting fireball. This isn't true, the spell has no attack roll and the firebolt automatically hits its targets. | ||
{{Unsigned2| 22:35, 14 November 2023|174.115.148.114}} | |||
: Thanks for noting that! - [[User:Sky|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky|talk]]) 23:02, 14 November 2023 (CET) | |||
:This must have been patched because the latest version of Firebolt? is definitely rolling an attack roll for me. [[Special:Contributions/24.161.29.45|24.161.29.45]] 18:22, 26 March 2024 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:22, 26 March 2024
No attack[edit source]
The page lists the spell as having an attack roll, and mentions the spell is exactly the same as firebolt except for the chance of casting fireball. This isn't true, the spell has no attack roll and the firebolt automatically hits its targets. — unsigned comment by 174.115.148.114 (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2023
- This must have been patched because the latest version of Firebolt? is definitely rolling an attack roll for me. 24.161.29.45 18:22, 26 March 2024 (CET)