Talk:Incense: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 15 August 2023 by Llamageddon
No edit summary |
Llamageddon (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. [[User:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|Cactus_Cuddle_Party]] ([[User talk:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|talk]]) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST) | If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. [[User:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|Cactus_Cuddle_Party]] ([[User talk:Cactus_Cuddle_Party|talk]]) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST) | ||
: I agree, absolutely. In this case, they are substantially different, as far as the wiki is concerned. The same item is listed as having little to no value on one section of the [[Miscellaneous]] page, and also as a 'Valuable' on the same page. Both are correct, depending on the incense variant. If this was changed, changing the item would be preferable to changing the page or sections. Not a big issue, but in principle, avoiding contradictory or misleading information can't hurt. I'm sure there are much higher priorities for clarification though, I just wanted to make a note of this on the talk page, in case it comes up, or another editor was wondering about the discrepancy. |
Revision as of 03:54, 16 August 2023
Low priority, but; there are at least 5 different visual variations of items called incense, some of which are valuable. Differentiating every one is most likely a very low priority, but adding a price range, or adding a 'junk' disambiguation page, might avoid confusion for people using the wiki to look up valuable loot. Llamageddon (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2023 (CEST)
If they're not substantively different, then list them all in a single page. Having to navigate 5 different pages + a disambiguation page just for some price variation is inconvenient for no meaningful purpose. Cactus_Cuddle_Party (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2023 (EST)
- I agree, absolutely. In this case, they are substantially different, as far as the wiki is concerned. The same item is listed as having little to no value on one section of the Miscellaneous page, and also as a 'Valuable' on the same page. Both are correct, depending on the incense variant. If this was changed, changing the item would be preferable to changing the page or sections. Not a big issue, but in principle, avoiding contradictory or misleading information can't hurt. I'm sure there are much higher priorities for clarification though, I just wanted to make a note of this on the talk page, in case it comes up, or another editor was wondering about the discrepancy.