Talk:Feats: Difference between revisions

From bg3.wiki
Latest comment: 21 December 2023 by Willowisp in topic Table delete
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? [[User:AstraTheDragon|AstraTheDragon]] ([[User talk:AstraTheDragon|talk]]) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? [[User:AstraTheDragon|AstraTheDragon]] ([[User talk:AstraTheDragon|talk]]) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
: I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a [[Help:Guide namespace|community guide]] and link it on the article (see [[Template:Guidenote]]) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
: I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a [[Help:Guide namespace|community guide]] and link it on the article (see [[Template:Guidenote]]) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)
== Polearm Master ==
Hey, Tested this feat at Patch #5, it also seems to work with Pike and Trident, even though not mentioned.
== Table delete ==
Why is someone going around deleting tables on the pages.  They're easier to read than lists. {{unsigned73.67.183.10|10:03, 21 December 2023}}
: Hi! Tables [[Help: Style manual#Links and tables|should be avoided when there are more accessible alternatives]], because while they look good on some devices they are an accessibility concern. The table on this page specifically wasn't implemented in a very accessible way, so until someone remakes the table correctly, this is the more accessible alternative. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (CET)
:: Working on a new and updated format so we can add the table back. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (CET)
::: Done! An entirely new table, improved over the original. [[User:Willowisp|Willowisp]] ([[User talk:Willowisp|talk]]) 22:59, 21 December 2023 (CET)

Latest revision as of 22:59, 21 December 2023

Spell sniper bugged?[edit source]

I've heard that rolling a 19 with spell sniper isn't resulting in the critical hit. Could be an important note as this would mean the feat is totally broken right now.

This was fixed as of Patch 3 👍AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Tips section?[edit source]

The article is mostly a big list written in objective language, I wonder if it might be useful to include a tips section explaining concepts such as half-feats and odd-numbered ability scores. Would that be within the scope of the article? AstraTheDragon (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

I think including a section called "Half-feats" that explains the concept of a half-feat would be within the scope of the article, though not as part of a dedicated "tips" section. We normally try to avoid making recommendations on the wiki's main namespace (since it's more difficult to get consensus on), but I think the concept of half-feats and how they interact with odd ability scores is technical enough to warrant inclusion, although worded in an objective language. You could also make it a community guide and link it on the article (see Template:Guidenote) if you think it's not objective enough for the main namespace version of the article. Willowisp (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2023 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Polearm Master[edit source]

Hey, Tested this feat at Patch #5, it also seems to work with Pike and Trident, even though not mentioned.

Table delete[edit source]

Why is someone going around deleting tables on the pages. They're easier to read than lists. Template:Unsigned73.67.183.10

Hi! Tables should be avoided when there are more accessible alternatives, because while they look good on some devices they are an accessibility concern. The table on this page specifically wasn't implemented in a very accessible way, so until someone remakes the table correctly, this is the more accessible alternative. Willowisp (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]
Working on a new and updated format so we can add the table back. Willowisp (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]
Done! An entirely new table, improved over the original. Willowisp (talk) 22:59, 21 December 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]